The People's Economist

Contact
About
Home
Financial education

Investors wonder if the 60/40 portfolio has a future | Financial Times

Investors wonder if the 60/40 portfolio has a future | Financial Times

September 22, 2020

Has the investment allocation paradigm radically shifted?

https://www.ft.com/content/fdb793a4-712e-477f-9a81-7f67aefda21a

Share this:

Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Related Posts:

Is multi-asset a mug's game? | Portfolio Adviser
How to ‘Marie Kondo’ your investment portfolio
Asset allocation specialists are the new snake oil salesmen
The Future Of Financial Advice
Don’t Be Surprised if Target-Date Funds Miss the Mark |…
Take The Future: Shell's scandalous deal for Nigeria’s Oil |…

Asset Allocation, Finance and Accounting, Investing

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment *

Name *

Email *

Website

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Δ

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
EY chairman admits ‘regret’ over Wirecard failures in letter to clients

NEXT
Fixing unemployment in America starts with reimagining the system – Vox

Topics

AI and Machine learning (21)
Banking (11)
Blockchain (10)
BREAKING NEWS (3)
Capitalism (15)
Central Bank (27)
China (6)
Climate change (16)
Commercial Real Estate (2)
Corruption (66)
Criminal Justice (4)
Crypto currency (3)
Current Events (34)
Democracy and the Rule of Law (3)
Digital Financial Services (5)
Economics (30)
Education (21)
Endowments (1)
Environment (13)
ESG (2)
Finance and Accounting (77)
- Accounting (5)
- Fintech (18)
- Investing (47)
  - Asset Allocation (6)
  - Private equity (9)
Financial Inclusion (4)
Financial Literacy (4)
Financial stability (43)
Fintech (5)
Food security (18)
Foreign policy (5)
Fraud (14)
Free market (13)
Geopolitics (16)
Global Development (47)
- Agriculture (5)
- Aid effectiveness (7)
- Financial Inclusion (10)
  - Digital finance (6)
- Humanitarian Relief (1)
Globalisation (13)
Governance (36)
Health (26)
Hedge funds and Private Equity (6)
Homelessness (1)
Housing (16)
Impact Investing (1)
India (3)
Inequality (6)
Inflation (2)
Infrastructure (4)
Internet Banking (1)
Labor (1)
Labor Economy (5)
Markets (2)
Monetary Policy (1)
Money Laundering (15)
Nutrition (4)
Original content (17)
Personal Finance (188)
- Auto Lending and Leasing (1)
- Consumer debt (10)
- Health Insurance (9)
- iInsurance (1)
- Investing (30)
- mortgage (9)
- Retirement (31)
- Student finance (20)
Philanthopy (2)
Privatization (8)
Renewable energy (2)
Small Business and SMEs (1)
Social Policy (149)
- Consumer Protection (4)
- Criminal justice (6)
- Development Aid (2)
- Education (4)
- Fiscal and Monetary Policy (12)
- Food benefits (2)
- General Benefits (14)
- Healthcare (29)
- Housing (9)
- Infrastructure (4)
- Mental Health (1)
- Pensions (12)
- Renewal Energy (1)
- Tax policy (11)
- Urban Development (3)
- Youth and Children (3)
Sovereign Debt (2)
Supply Chain (3)
Tax Havens (3)
Taxes (21)
Technology (16)
- AI (9)
- Big data (7)
Trafficking and slavery (2)
Uncategorized (31)
United Kingdom (21)
Urbanisation (1)
War and Conflict (4)
Water and Sanitation (2)
Worker Rights (3)
World Bank and the IMF (4)

Search

Search for:

About This Site

This may be a good place to introduce yourself and your site or include some credits.

Find Us

Address
123 Main Street
New York, NY 10001

Hours
Monday—Friday: 9:00AM–5:00PM
Saturday & Sunday: 11:00AM–3:00PM

© 2023 The People's Economist | Powered by WordPress | Theme by MadeForWriters